California can either make fire part of its cultural identity, or it can watch its heritage go up in smoke

In the early 1900s, this practice of cultural burning was criminalized when federal and state officials initiated an era of fire suppression. The stated goal was to save trees — to protect forests from the very process that had shaped and maintained them through time. Yet we know now those losses weren’t avoided; rather, by removing fire, the losses were stalled, accentuated. It’s clear that the fires that burn now are making up for generations of missed fire. The more we’ve rejected fire as the natural — and human — process that it is, the more volatile it has become.

Previous
Previous

Forest management not so clear cut

Next
Next

Welcome to ‘Trump world,’ the climate future scientists fear