Does increased forest protection correspond to higher fire severity in frequent‐fire forests of the Western United States? (Bradley et al., 2016)

Full citation: Bradley, C., Hanson, C., & DellaSala, D. (2016). Does increased forest protection correspond to higher fire severity in frequent‐fire forests of the Western United States? Ecosphere, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1492

Abstract: There is a widespread view among land managers and others that the protected status of many forestlands in the western United States corresponds with higher fire severity levels due to historical restrictions on logging that contribute to greater amounts of biomass and fuel loading in less intensively managed areas, particularly after decades of fire suppression. This view has led to recent proposals—both administrative and legislative—to reduce or eliminate forest protections and increase some forms of logging based on the belief that restrictions on active management have increased fire severity. We investigated the relationship between protected status and fire severity using the Random Forests algorithm applied to 1500 fires affecting 9.5 million hectares between 1984 and 2014 in pine (Pinus ponderosa, Pinus jeffreyi) and mixed-conifer forests of western United States, accounting for key topographic and climate variables. We found forests with higher levels of protection had lower severity values even though they are generally identified as having the highest overall levels of biomass and fuel loading. Our results suggest a need to reconsider current overly simplistic assumptions about the relationship between forest protection and fire severity in fire management and policy.

Keywords: biodiversity; climate; fire frequency; fire severity; fire suppression; Gap Analysis Program levels; logging; protected areas