Back to the future: Indigenous relationality, kincentricity and the North American Model of wildlife management (Martinez et al., 2023)

Full citation: Martinez, D. J., Cannon, C. E. B., McInturff, A., Alagona, P. S., & Pellow, D. N. (2023). Back to the future: Indigenous relationality, kincentricity and the North American model of Wildlife Management. Environmental Science & Policy, 140, 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.12.010

Abstract: For more than a century, wildlife conservation in the United States has been built on the notion that nonhuman animal populations are resources to be regulated by law and managed efficiently, according to the best available science and in the public trust. This approach, known as the North American Model of Wildlife Management, has come under increasing criticism for excluding diverse viewpoints that have the potential to advance both conservation and environmental justice goals. How might the greater inclusion of Indigenous worldviews and Indigenous Studies concepts, such as radical relationality and kincentricity, improve western wildlife management? In this paper, we review three case studies of tribal wildlife stewardship programs in the land currently known as California—the Maidu Summit Consortium’s beaver restoration project, the Karuk Tribe’s elk management program, and the Yurok Tribe’s condor recovery effort—that illuminate generative connections among ecological restoration, Indigenous cultural practices, community wellbeing, and environmental justice. Radical relationality and kincentricity offer enormous potential for informing stewardship and recovery efforts that produce more just outcomes for both people and wildlife.

Keywords: Kincentricity, Indigenous stewardship, Relationality, Wildlife management, Environmental justice

Key Excerpt: “Supporting Indigenous worldviews and practices improves outcomes for both people and wildlife.” “Only recently…have these restoration efforts acknowledged and considered the long-standing interest of the Karuk people in elk stewardship. In particular, recent collaborations between CDFW and the Karuk tribe have begun combining traditional fire management with western ecological science to explore how these practices might promote elk recovery even in a landscape heavily altered by a history of colonization and fire suppression (Karuk Tribe, 2019).”

Previous
Previous

Rethinking the focus on forest fires in federal wildland fire management: Landscape patterns and trends of non-forest and forest burned area (Crist, 2023)

Next
Next

High-severity burned area and proportion exceed historic conditions in Sierra Nevada, California, and adjacent ranges (Williams et al., 2022)